These are two different genres that often get lumped together under
the genre Speculative Fiction. I know in the library I go browsing and I
find Star Wars next to Lord of the Rings. So often, they are together
because people think: these are two genres that represent the
impossible, so they should be together. I personally think they should
be separated, but I can see where they are coming from. So let's define
both of these.
Science fiction is usually defined as being
grounded in reality and possible in some distant future. Fantasy isn't
grounded in reality and admits the possibility of magic and supernatural
creatures. Seems like it would be a pretty clear line separating them.
In most cases, it is. But not always (of course, no genre is really
clearly defined. There can be romantic thrillers or science fiction
horrors). I'll go over the melding of these two genres farther down. But
first, let's talk about what separates them
Lord of the Rings is
fantasy. Someone wielding a gun in middle earth would be totally out of
place. Many fantasy authors stop their world's technology growth before
guns are invented. It makes it simpler, with swords and sorcery. Often
the appeal of these worlds is the simplicity. Aside from unfair taxes
and lawyers, the people didn't have to worry about modern problems like
insurance, internet, mortages, car registration, subscriptions, paying
the electric, gas, water, and heating bills, or voting in elections.
Whether these things are improvements or not on life, who knows. But
people like to fantasize about living in a simpler world, where going on
a quest could make all the difference. Exploration, justice, politics,
and religion are all themes explored in fantasy.
Asimov is science
fiction. He based his books on what could be extrapolated from current
understanding of science and the laws of physics. Exploration, politics,
and social consequences of technology are all explored in this genre.
It embraces the mortage and bill paying and complicates life even more
with robots and space travel. Unfortunately, if you're a purist writer,
traveling to other worlds is really limited, as there has been no
realistic way suggested, that I know of, to surpass the speed of light.
Even theories that haven't been disproven, like using dark energy to
create a bubble in space, require so much energy that they would
basically be impossible. Hyperspace, the catch all phrase for some way
to bypass the speed of light, doesn't really have any explanations
either. So much of science fiction is, in a way, fantasy, with guns and
spaceships. So the definitions above don't always apply. Just remember
this: sci fi deals more with technology, while fantasy deals more with
magic. In crossovers, whichever element is emphasized determines the
genre.
A perfect example of melding of science fiction and fantasy
is an old movie series you might have heard of. Anyone remember Star
Wars? Although it first seems very science fiction, there is one element
that doesn't have any basis in science (despite George Lucas' attempt
to inject it in episode I (Mr. Lucas, please read my post on magic and
how it should be full of wonder)). The force changes everything. While
subtler than some magic, it is there and plays a big role in the movies,
despite Han Solo's attempts to deny it (which is kind of odd, since
20-30 years earlier, the galaxy kept peace through the Jedi and no one
seemed to doubt them). So despite being labeled science fiction for
space ships and blasters, it has some strong fantasy elements (the
force, prophecies, monsters, swords, etc)
I enjoy fantasy more
than science fiction, because of the element of wonder, of the existence
of the impossible. Science fiction often tries too hard to explain
everything. Not to say I don't read science fiction, though. Orson Scott Card
is a favorite, including his Ender books. There are others as well, but
generally I prefer fantasy. Sometimes, in crossing over between the two
genres, it is done well (ironically, aside from Star Wars, the best
I've seen in crossovers is in video games, especially the Final Fantasy series). Sometimes, though, I don't really enjoy it much. Anne McCaffrey's
Dragonriders of Pern books, though I thought I would like them for
having dragons, my favorite animal, but by making it based in science,
the books lost their magic for me. Others might not have this problem.
It all depends on your tastes and what you like.
For more information, please reference this site.
Reblogged from http://sageeyesblog.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/science-fiction-versus-fantasy/
No comments:
Post a Comment